Category: We Heart Health Literacy

Here at We ❤ Health Literacy Headquarters, we’re all about the tools that empower people to take control of their health. Today, we want to chat about why these tools are especially important for older adults.

As a group, this crowd has some complicated health care needs: they have more chronic illnesses than any other age group, which means they need a lot of health care. And unfortunately, they’re more likely than any other age group to have low health literacy. According to the National Assessment of Adult Literacy, only 3 percent of older adults have proficient health literacy skills.

Plus, unlike wine and cheese, vision and hearing generally don’t improve with age — and vision and hearing loss can make it harder to find and understand information. In a nutshell, older adults need more health care and they’re likely to have a harder time accessing it.

And that means our job as health communicators becomes extra important. Of course all the regular suspects apply — write in plain language, provide a clear main message… you know all the things, dear readers. But keep these specific tips in mind when writing for older audiences, too.

• Make your content extra easy to see and read. Choose fonts with good contrast, consider using a larger font size, and increase leading.
• Prioritize images. Visuals are great for helping people remember things, so make sure to use plenty of relevant images to support your main message and hold folks’ attention.
• Think about print. Older adults are less likely to have internet access, and they may be less comfortable reading online. So try getting your message out the old-fashioned way, too. And if you’re writing online health content, make sure it’s print friendly!
• Use teach-back and show-me. When communicating in person, check for understanding by asking older patients to explain or demonstrate the thing you’re trying to communicate.
• Skip the elderspeak. We had to write a whole post on how not to talk to older folks. So yeah, just don’t do that.

The bottom line: Older adults need (and deserve!) information about health and health care that’s clear, accessible, and respectful.

Tweet about it: This week from @CommunicateHlth: #HealthLit tips for communicating with #OlderAdults: https://bit.ly/2Z80zue

Have you ever met someone and just clicked with them right away? Don’t you love that feeling of instant understanding and connection?

Well today, dear readers, we’re talking about a different kind of first impression — the first impression your health content makes on your users. If you go to a new health website and you’re greeted by gobs of confusing information and TEXT IN ALL CAPS, it doesn’t make for a great first impression.

But an especially nasty type of bad first impression in health communication is due to a lack of cultural competence. We’ll sum that term up like this: cultural competence is the ability to meet patients’ social, cultural, and language needs.

So what does a cultural competence fail look like? Imagine a non-binary person going to a new doctor and filling out an intake form with only 2 checkboxes: “female” and “male.” Not only could that make them feel invisible, it might cause them to doubt the quality of care they’ll get — and rightly so. So how could the doctor’s office make a better first impression? Easy! By making the intake form inclusive and welcoming for everyone.

First impressions aren’t just about words — design matters, too. Picture this: a black woman searches online for information about breastfeeding. On the first site she visits, all the images show white parents and babies. She may wonder if the information is really for her, and she’ll likely move on to a site that makes her feel represented and included.

So don’t get off on the wrong foot with users! You can start learning about cultural competence at HRSA’s Culture, Language, and Health Literacy site. But you can’t just read about cultural competence and be done with it — it’s a continuous process of checking in with your audience (and yourself) to make sure you’re not making harmful assumptions or missing important cultural context.

When you’re assessing your materials for cultural competence, ask yourself questions like:

• Who am I trying to reach?
• What do I know about my audience’s culture, language, and beliefs?
• How can I get feedback from my audience to make sure I’m on track?

Improving cultural competence can go a long way toward creating health content that makes a great first impression — and starts a healthy, lasting relationship with your audience.

(Also, if you’re looking for a beach read, the We ❤ Health Literacy Book Club really enjoyed Anne Fadiman’s The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down. It touches on some of this good stuff — check it out!)

The bottom line: Brush up on cultural competence to make a better first impression in your health materials.

Tweet about it: You know what they say: first impressions count! @CommunicateHlth shares how #CulturalCompetence gets your #HealthLit content off on the right foot: https://bit.ly/2TeGvVA

Chances are you’ve heard of the “war on cancer.” Maybe you’ve written about someone who “beat” their disease — or “lost the battle.” Doctors, patients, and health writers use militaristic language all the time. But today, dear readers, we’re calling for a ceasefire in health materials.

Why? Because the connotations of these words can affect the health decisions people make and the way they feel about their health. Say someone dies of cancer and you write that they “lost their fight.” Could that imply that they didn’t try hard enough? That dying of cancer was somehow their fault? Ugh.

Research has shown that patients who use negative metaphors like “enemy” to describe their disease are more likely to feel depressed and anxious. And militaristic language doesn’t just affect current patients. Studies show that framing cancer prevention as a fight against an enemy can make people less likely to take steps to reduce their risk of cancer.

As health communicators, it’s our job to think about these things. And there are plenty of ways to write about serious diseases without firing off fightin’ words.

Follow these tips to (mostly) avoid militaristic language in health content:

• Be direct. It’s okay — good even — to just write about “having cancer” (or whatever you’re writing about). These words are simple, accurate, and easy to understand. No need for “fighting,” “battling,” or “waging war.” People have cancer. Period.
• Consider other metaphors. Metaphors can be super useful when communicating about health — they can help people understand complicated topics and make emotional connections. So try other options on for size! For example, you could frame a disease as a journey that patients experience or a puzzle that researchers are trying to solve. You’ll get the point across without the war words.
• Take your cue from your audience. You may not need to eliminate militaristic language from your health writing lock, stock, and barrel (see what we did there?). Some people with cancer or other diseases may find militaristic words motivating and empowering. If that’s the case, then great! Let’s just call this reason 348,578,756D to test your health materials with your target audience.

The bottom line: As a rule, leave the war words to the war correspondents — and out of your health content.

Tweet about it: Don’t surrender to the urge to use militaristic language in #HealthLit content. @CommunicateHlth explains why to avoid words like “battle,” “war,” and “fight”: https://bit.ly/2JUE9sd

We’ve already talked about all things #Twitter in our social media series. But today, we’re taking a deeper dive into a powerful Twitter feature that we really ❤︎: #hashtags!

Why are hashtags so powerful, you ask? They may seem merely decorative, but they’re actually key to how Twitter curates its content. Hashtags direct users to related topics and events. And when users search a hashtag that you’ve used, they can see your content — even if they’re not following you on Twitter! (Mind: blown.)

So if you want to increase your reach and optimize your Twitter content, use hashtags! Follow these tips to up your hashtag game:

• Choose relevant hashtags. Sure, using random, popular hashtags might drive a few eyeballs to your post. But if the tag doesn’t fit, you risk disappointing people and losing potential followers. No one wants to search for #HealthLit and find, you know, unicorns.
• Aim for 2 hashtags max in a single tweet. Research shows that crowding tweets with a million hashtags means less engagement, not more. It gets tiresome quickly — #just #look #how #annoying #it #is #to #read #this. There may be times when it makes sense to use more than 2 (like if you’re participating in a Twitter chat with multiple hashtags), but 2 is a good rule of thumb to prevent hashtag fatigue.
• Search hashtags before you tweet. Search on Twitter and Google to make sure your hashtags are credible, current, and popular. Tweeting about the #flu? Check which hashtags CDC is using! And searching also helps you make sure your hashtags don’t pull up unintended stuff in the Twitterverse. (Because you really might be surprised by hashtag search results. Like, really surprised. We sure have been.)
• Capitalize each new word in a hashtag. This helps keep things #EasyToRead in hashtags with multiple words.
• Check the Twitter trending topics. If you’re looking for hashtag inspo, find out which ones are trending in your area. Just remember: only use hashtags that are relevant to your content!

Now, dear readers, take this #TwitterWisdom out into the world and do great Twitter-related things!

The bottom line: Use relevant hashtags to engage with audiences on Twitter — and get the most out of your #HealthLit tweets.

Tweet about it: Check out @CommunicateHlth’s tips for using #hashtags responsibly in #HealthLit tweets: https://bit.ly/2JFQ3WJ

Let’s say you’re creating a complex health communication product, like a website with health content for patients, doctors, and researchers. That’s quite the task! Each of those user groups might come to your site looking for different kinds of information — and it’s your job to make sure the site meets each group’s needs.

So how do you start? We’ve talked before about our love of personas to keep users’ goals top of mind. In this week’s installment of We ❤ Health Literacy, we’re adding another tool to your health literacy toolbox: user need statements.

User need statements (also called user stories) help define the big-picture problem you’re trying to solve on behalf of your users. And they’re a key part of the user-centered design process.

Follow these tips to craft a great user need statement:

• Focus on what, not how. Keep the statement focused on the problem you’re trying to solve — and don’t skip ahead to half-baked solutions.
• Be specific. Vague, amorphous user statements beget vague, amorphous products. The more specific your statement is, the better!
• Make it actionable. Point your team toward the must-solve problems with direct, actionable language.
• Ground it in user research. Whenever possible, base your user need statements on insights from focus groups or in-depth interviews.

Got it? Great! Now… what exactly do these fancy statements look like? User need statements have 3 components: user, action, and reason. They look like this: “As a [user], I want to [action], so that I can [reason].”

Ready to see some user need statements in action? Try these on for size:

• As a parent, I want to find activities my family can do together so that we can be healthier and my kids will put down their electronic devices.
• As an older patient, I want to easily find contact information for my doctors so that I can ask follow-up questions.
• As a project director at a county health department, I want to know how other communities are combatting tobacco use so that I can build a successful anti-tobacco program in my county.

The bottom line: Write user need statements to define the problem you’re trying to solve — your users will ❤ you for it!

Picture this: you’re 36 years old, you’re pregnant, and you’ve already got plenty of things to worry about. Will your future child get into a good college? Require expensive orthodontia? Fall in with a bad crowd and bring shame upon the family?

Then your doctor gestures at your midsection and refers — in a casual, chummy sort of way — to your “geriatric” pregnancy. Say what? The word “geriatric” tends to conjure nursing homes, not nursing mothers. But doctors commonly use it to describe pregnancies in women over age 35.

Even if you steer clear of “geriatric,” the other options aren’t much better. “Advanced maternal age” and even “older moms” send the same misleading and derogatory message: you’re too old to be pregnant. So, dear readers, what’s a better way to talk about age and pregnancy? Use neutral language and stick to the facts.

Instead of this:

• Advanced maternal age is tied to increased risk of gestational diabetes.
• Extra screenings are recommended for geriatric pregnancies.

Try this:

• If you’re over age 35, you’re at higher risk for gestational diabetes.
• If you’re over age 35, ask your doctor about extra screenings you may need.

Problem solved? Not so fast! The judgment fest doesn’t stop after the birth. If your baby is on the low end of the growth charts, doctors may call it “failure to thrive.” That’s right, babies can fail at growing up, just like their moms can fail at… staying young.

Terms like “failure to thrive” may be convenient catchalls for insurance-coding purposes, but they’re no help at all to anxious new parents. Instead, address the specific problem head on: “If your baby isn’t growing quickly enough, take these steps to help them gain more weight.” See? That’s one parental panic attack averted.

The bottom line: Give pregnant women and tiny babies a break — skip the judgy medical terms and use plain, neutral language.

Tweet about it: Did you hear the one about the geriatric mom-to-be and the baby who failed at life? No? Well, it wasn’t funny anyway. @CommunicateHlth talks terms to avoid when talking moms and babies: https://bit.ly/2KDPf6t #HealthLit

If you’ve done any spring cleaning lately, chances are you got some inspiration from tidying expert Marie Kondo’s KonMari method. Kondo encourages people to jettison objects that don’t “spark joy” and embrace a simpler, tidier lifestyle. This week, we’re applying Kondo’s rules to another space that may be in need of some decluttering: (y)our beloved health websites.

That’s right, dear readers, it’s time to sweep out the cobwebs and take out the trash before your website devolves into a hoarder’s paradise. Effective content maintenance doesn’t just mean updating and adding pages — it means retiring content that’s outlived its usefulness.

Here’s our spin on Kondo’s 6 basic rules of tidying, web content edition:

1. Commit yourself to tidying up your web content. Don’t let maintenance slide when shiny new projects come along. Implement a regular content maintenance schedule and stick to it.

2. Imagine your ideal website. When deciding whether to keep or kill content, it’s important to have a guiding vision in mind. Make sure you’re working toward well-defined goals for your site, and not just retiring pages willy-nilly.

3. Finish discarding problem content first. We’ve all seen it: the site that invests in flashy new homepage content every week, but clearly hasn’t done a full content inventory since the early 2000s. Remember, users could end up anywhere on your site — so prioritize weeding out content you don’t want them to see.

4. Assess content by category, not just by location. Kondo says to tidy up category by category, not room by room. And looking at content by type rather than by location on your site can help identify miscategorizations, duplications, and content areas that are turning into silos.

5. Follow the right order in your content process. It can be tempting to jump right in and start tossing troublesome pages down the trash chute of web history — but skipping steps can lead to wasted effort. Make sure you have buy-in from all your stakeholders before you start making updates.

6. Ask your users if the content sparks joy. You may squeal with happiness over your content, but does it send your users into similar fits of ecstasy? Without user research, you can’t know for sure. Investing in user research will help you make informed decisions about your content and ensure that it sparks joy for the end users — not just for the content creators.

The bottom line: Tidying up your website means figuring out what sparks joy for your users — and letting go of content that sparks… less joyful feelings.

Tweet about it: Does your web content spark joy? @CommunicateHlth shares @MarieKondo-inspired tips for tidying up your #HealthLit website: https://bit.ly/2Kvaebt

When you hear the word “tension,” what comes to mind? The force of your blood pumping against your artery walls, you say? Well, you might be the only one!

For all our fellow jargon naysayers out there, here’s a new installment of our “use simpler words” series. Today’s target: “hypertension.”

Hypertension is medical jargon for high blood pressure. And while fancy-pants words are always on our chopping block, this one is especially tricky because it contains 2 red herrings for people with limited health literacy: “hyper” and “tension.”

For example, a reasonable person might associate “hyper” with toddlers who just hit the sugar sauce, and “tension” with adults who are feeling a bit, ahem, saucy. And we’re guessing those associations won’t have anyone running for the blood pressure cuff.

Besides the potential for “hypertension” to mislead people, there’s another really good reason not to use it. That’s right, dear readers, it’s one of those jargon terms that has a super straightforward and totally accurate substitute.

So skip phrases like:

• Hypertension increases your risk for heart attack and stroke.
• Get tested for hypertension regularly.

And go for these easy options instead:

• High blood pressure increases your risk for heart attack and stroke.
• Get your blood pressure checked regularly.

The bottom line: Don’t send your readers’ blood pressure through the roof — skip “hypertension.”

Tweet about it: Writing about “hypertension”? Let’s not! @CommunicateHlth makes the case for “high blood pressure” in #HealthLit materials: https://bit.ly/2KijSy8

If you’re a Game of Thrones fan, you may have followed the gripping drama of the takeout coffee cup that appeared in a recent episode of the fantasy TV series. And if one anachronistic beverage blunder wasn’t enough, a plastic water bottle made a cameo in the finale!

These kinds of bloopers are all fun and games in a TV show, but out-of-place content in health materials can have real-world consequences. So today we’re sharing tips to keep sneaky unwanted elements out of your health communication products.

Watch out for these common content interlopers:

• Imposters. You may not be in danger of leaving your morning coffee in your poster copy, but what about leaving in placeholder text? Always clearly mark your placeholders, so you don’t risk publishing imposters instead of real content.
• Time travelers. Game of Thrones encountered drink containers from the future, but in health content you’re more likely to run into relics from the past. Outdated stats and figures are easy enough to catch. But keep a special eye out for outdated terminology — especially language describing groups of people. Stay informed about preferred terms for different demographics, and update any language that’s past its prime.
• Trespassers. Identifying bad content is one thing — but what about good content that’s in the wrong place? Content can trespass by addressing the wrong audience, veering off topic, or failing to fit the format. It’s your job to relocate these trespassers to materials where they’ll feel more at home.
• Space oddities. When lots of different people touch content, absurdities can sneak in along the way. It’s a bit like a game of telephone: writers, editors, designers, developers, and subject matter experts pass content back and forth, and eventually something gets lost (or garbled) in translation. Always make time to reread the final product with fresh eyes to catch things that just don’t belong.

The bottom line: Keep an eye out for interlopers in your health materials — and banish out-of-place content (coffee cups included).

Tweet about it: What does the #GameOfThrones coffee cup have to do with #HealthLit? @CommunicateHlth shares tips for catching unwanted elements in health content: https://bit.ly/2Wq0Lb5

Climate change is one of the most important public health issues of our time. And that means we all need to talk about it! But it can be hard to confront problems that seem so hopeless and overwhelming.

So today, we’re broaching this stressful subject from the Hollywood angle. What better way to approach our own real-life disaster scenario than with a blockbuster disaster movie? What better way to confront actual global warming than by watching an imaginary Ice Age rapidly descend on the northern United States? That’s right, dear readers, we’re talking about 2004’s The Day After Tomorrow.

In this pseudoscientific action flick, a rogue paleoclimatologist (Dennis Quaid, burly science dad) begs world leaders to address climate change before it’s too late. Shockingly, they refuse. And the very next day, climate change arrives to rub their noses in it.

Just as Dennis predicted, glacial melt makes the ocean a tad less salty, disrupting currents and triggering an unprecedented storm system (hurricanes forming over land!) that plunges the northern hemisphere into a new Ice Age. Oh, and it all happens in a matter of days.

So will climate change really turn Manhattan into a walk-in freezer in less than a week? No, not really. But the possibility of so-called “abrupt climate change” is science fact, not science fiction. These events, when major climate shifts play out on a scale of years or decades rather than centuries, have happened before. And recent human-caused climate change makes these abrupt events more likely to happen in the future.

The real-world stakes are high — that much is clear. But what can The Day After Tomorrow teach us about climate change and public health?

• Keep pushing for policy changes. The world leaders in the movie fail to take action before disaster strikes — just as many world leaders today are dragging their heels on climate action. But as the movie shows, delaying tough decisions on climate change leads to far greater political costs — not to mention loss of life — in the future.
• Be ready for community-level action. When political leaders fail to act, the responsibility to find solutions falls on regular people. In the movie, we see a band of strangers work together to survive in the New York Public Library, burning volumes of tax law to stay warm and scavenging medicine for a girl with an infected wound. Hopefully, you won’t have that particular experience. But we all need to be thinking about local responses to these global problems.
• Remind decision-makers that we all have skin in the game. The vice president scoffs at Dennis’s plan to abandon the entire northern United States to the ice — until he learns that the climatologist’s own son is in Manhattan. And no matter where you live on planet Earth, your kids will be affected by real-world climate change.
• Don’t count on Dennis Quaid to save everybody. His son may survive till the end credits, but plenty of other people get frozen solid. So if Dennis Quaid is your dad, maybe he can be your climate emergency plan. The rest of us are going have to save ourselves. And that means talking about these unpleasant problems and working together to find solutions.

The bottom line: Watch The Day After Tomorrow for some truly wild weather — and some serious motivation to confront the impacts of climate change on public health.

Tweet about it: What can disaster flicks teach us about climate change and public health? @CommunicateHlth goes to the movies: https://bit.ly/2Q8gqGi #HealthLit